Home PageChapter ActivtiesMeetings and EventsChapter and National NewsJoin SCI

About Us
Photo Gallery

Chapter Newsletters
Download past issues of the Western Montana Chapter Newsletter (pdf format) by clicking on the links below. You will need Adobe Acrobat Reader to view the files. It can be downloaded free of charge by visiting http://get.adobe.com/reader/.

Consider submitting an article for publication in the Western Montana Chapter Newsletter! Articles must be no more than three pages in length and must contain contact information for the author. Graphics and photos are welcome!

Email submissions to editor@westernmtsci.org

Interested in advertising in the Newsletter? Costs for a business-card size ad are $25.00 per issue while 1/4 page ads are $40.00 per issue. Call our Newsletter Editor, Traci Ulberg at (406) 273-7224 to reserve your space.

 

Ninth Circuit Keeps Yellowstone Grizzly on the Threatened Species List
December 6, 2011. Despite the best efforts of SCI, the Federal government, Montana, Wyoming and others, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently ruled that the Yellowstone population of grizzly bears must remain on the threatened species list for now.  On a single ground, the Court upheld the 2010 ruling by Montana District Court Judge Molloy that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service improperly delisted the grizzly bear.  The Court agreed with the District Court that the Service had not properly explained how projected declines in Whitebark Pine seeds, a primary food source for the bear, would not threaten the species.  The Court did reverse Judge Molloy on one issue raised by SCI and others, that the existing regulatory mechanisms were sufficient to remove the grizzly from the threatened list.  Unfortunately, the Court’s concerns about the Whitebark Pine issue are sufficient to vacate the delisting.  What comes next is uncertain at this time.  Judge Molloy and FWS, with input from SCI and others, will now have to determine how to proceed.

Above the law: In Lake County, it's hard to tell some cops from the criminals
December 1, 2011. In 2005, a moose was standing somewhere in the mountains north of Columbia Falls when Jesse Jacobs allegedly shot it. Jacobs didn't have a permit, however, so he reportedly got one from a friend who was a member of the Confederated Salish and Kootenai Tribes. The tribal member took the meat. Jacobs claimed the head and antlers, which he would later mount and hang on his wall.

Jacobs, who had been in the Lake County Sheriff's Office's reserve training program, was charged with two poaching felonies in August 2010.

Meanwhile, Lake County Sheriff's Deputy Dan Duryee was spinning tall tales about his heroic service in the Gulf War, when in fact Duryee had never even been in the military. The Montana Public Safety Officer Standards and Training Council, or POST, is the state body that polices the police. As POST investigated Duryee's lies last year, it learned of other, potentially criminal activities in the Lake County Sheriff's Office—including poaching. Read more.

Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (FWP) has issued a Decision Notice (DN) for its Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) on Transfer/Placement of Bison
Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks (FWP) has issued a Decision Notice (DN) for its Draft Environmental Assessment (EA) that evaluated four locations for the interim placement of brucellosis-free bison. Those locations under consideration included: FWP's Marias River Wildlife Management Area (WMA) and Spotted Dog WMA, and Tribal lands on the Fort Peck and Fort Belknap Reservations. FWP will recommend to the FWP Commission that 68 bison be relocated to the Fort Belknap and Fort Peck Reservations pending the negotiations and approval of Memorandums of Understanding between the Tribes and FWP. No bison will be moved to the WMAs, and the bison currently at the Green Ranch will remain there. To view the full EA click here.

The Fish, Wildlife & Parks Commission is expected to make a final decision on the project at its December 9th meeting Helena. Commission meetings are open to the public.

H.R. 1581: Wilderness and Roadless Area Release Act of 2011 (112th Congress: 2011-2012)

Summary. To release wilderness study areas administered by the Bureau of Land Management that are not suitable for wilderness designation from continued management as defacto wilderness areas and to release inventoried roadless areas within the National Forest System that are not recommended for wilderness designation from the land use restrictions of the 2001 Roadless Area Conservation Final Rule and the 2005 State Petitions for Inventoried Roadless Area Management Final Rule, and for other purposes. Click here for full fact sheet.

How does this impact Montana?
In Montana, nearly 27 million acres are federally owned (28.9% of state). A breakdown is shown below:

  • Forest Service = 17,082,821 acres
  • National Park Service = 1,214,184 acres
  • Fish and Wildlife Service = 635,066 acres
  • Bureau of Land Management (BLM) = 7,981,452 acres
  • Department of Defense (DOD) = 8,338 acres
    Total of these 5 = 26,921,861 acres, 28.9% of state
    (State total = 93,271,040 acres)

Note: these are fee-simple acres as reported by each agency as federal lands under their sole or primary jurisdiction. 

Of the 43 million acres held in limbo under wilderness characteristics nationally, how many acres in Montana are in this designation?
This may be a little confusing.  The total inventoried roadless areas in Montana equal 6,397,000 acres, as they existed in Nov. 2000.  Those numbers are only the Forest Service inventoried roadless areas, and do not include BLM's wilderness study areas (WSAs).  The BLM has a total of 12,985,820 acres of WSAs, of which some have been recommended for wilderness designation.  BLM WSAs in Montana total 449,963 acres, as of the end of FY2010; how much of this has been recommended for wilderness is not reported.

In calculating an estimate of acreage that would be released in Montana by H.R. 1581, Forest Service inventoried roadless acreage should be added (excluding the area recommended for wilderness) as well as the BLM WSAs not recommended for wilderness.  Since the latter is not known, we can look at a range and assume that 5% to 25% of the WSA acreage had been recommended (about 22,500 to 112,500 acres), thus leaving about 337,500 to 427,500 acres if BLM WSA acreage is released. Thus, the total acreage released in Montana is probably about 5,900,000 acres to 6,000,000 acres. A significant impact.

House Natural Resources Committee Passes Legislation Protecting Sportsmen’s Access

November 17, 2011. Columbus, Ohio – Today the House Natural Resources Committee passed H.R. 2834, the Recreational Fishing and Hunting Heritage and Opportunities Act. This bill would protect fishing, hunting and recreational shooting on federal lands.  Read more...

House Natural Resources Committee Passes Legislation Protecting Sportsmen’s Access

November 17, 2011. Columbus, Ohio – Today the House Natural Resources Committee passed H.R. 2834, the Recreational Fishing and Hunting Heritage and Opportunities Act. This bill would protect fishing, hunting and recreational shooting on federal lands.

H.R. 2834 passed the Committee with strong bipartisan support by a vote of 29-14. This vital piece of legislation would require fishing, hunting and recreational shooting to be included in all federal land planning documents and would fix numerous inconsistencies in federal law that are being exploited by litigious environmental groups to reduce hunting opportunities on federal land. This bill is strongly supported by the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance, Safari Club International, the National Rifle Association, and millions of sportsmen across the country.

“This legislation is vital given the Administration’s recent actions toward hunters and recreational sport shooters,” said Melissa Simpson, Director of Government Affairs for Safari Club International. “Sportsmen have repeatedly sought to collaborate with the federal agencies and have been greeted with proposed closures in areas such as the Sonoran Desert National Monument, where the BLM intends to close the entire one-half million acre national monument to shooters.  There are some 63 shooting sites within the monument, closure of which will end access for sportsmen.   Passage of H.R. 2834 is necessary to protect against these anti-hunting policies.”

“Sportsmen are increasingly facing attacks aimed at stopping them from using public land,” said Bud Pidgeon, President and CEO of the U.S. Sportsmen’s Alliance.  “This bill closes the loopholes that anti-hunters have used time and time again to try to deny access for hunting, fishing and shooting.  Now is the time to put a stop to it.  We are extremely pleased and appreciative that the House Natural Resources Committee recognized the importance of this bill.”

Special Update - SCI and the NRA Continue Fight to Protect Idaho and Montana Wolf Hunts!

November 7, 2011. SCI and the NRA are continuing their aggressive fight to protect the scientifically sound wolf hunts already underway in Montana and Idaho and to keep wolf management in the hands of the states.  On November 8, 2011, SCI and NRA go back to court to battle anti-hunting organizations who ignore science for the purposes of their own fundraising and who continue to challenge the federal law that delisted the wolves of the Northern Rocky Mountains.   

This week, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals will hear an appeal filed by two sets of animal rights groups, led by Alliance for the Wild Rockies and Center for Biological Diversity.  The hearing will take place in Pasadena, California.

The appeal challenges the constitutionality of federal legislation that directed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to delist the wolves of Montana, Idaho, and portions of Utah, Oregon and Washington State.  Montana federal District Court Judge Donald Malloy grudgingly upheld the constitutionality of the law. The animal rights groups appealed that decision and are attempting to persuade the Ninth Circuit that this law violates the Constitution.

SCI and the NRA intervened in the appeal and persuaded the Ninth Circuit to allow hunters a voice in the controversy.  Two other groups, led by Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation and the Montana Farm Bureau Federation, were also granted intervention.  SCI, the NRA and the other two intervening groups are coordinating their efforts to make the most effective use of the time that the court has given them to participate in the oral argument.

The Alliance for the Wild Rockies also filed a motion for emergency relief in an attempt to stop the wolf hunt currently underway in Montana and Idaho.  The Ninth Circuit refused to take action prior to the hearing and will be considering the motion at the Nov. 8th hearing.   SCI and NRA submitted a detailed brief, enhanced with statements from two wolf experts, that supports the hunts as sustainable wildlife management strategies. 

The Ninth Circuit will likely take the Constitutional challenge and the emergency motion under advisement, and issue their rulings in the weeks after the hearing.  SCI will continue to advocate the delisting of recovered wolves throughout the west and will stand up to protect hunters against litigious anti-hunting radicals.

Please consider supporting SCI’s efforts to protect wolf hunting at www.hunterdefensefund.org.

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT ACTION ALERT

October 18, 2011. On Thursday Oct. 13 the Subcommittee on Investigations and Oversight of the Committee on Science, Space and Technology held a hearing on the proper role of science and policy in implementing the Endangered Species Act.  This hearing was held in light of the recent claims of false testimony by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) personnel and the unprecedented settlement agreement recently entered into by the Service which essentially cedes control of the endangered species program to litigious environmental groups for the next six years.  SCI believes that this agreement does not use the best science and could harm wildlife and therefore SCI has actively opposed this settlement agreement in the current form.

Congressman Paul Broun of Georgia chaired the hearing which explored the manipulation of scientific data and how this influences on policy decisions. Several points were brought up about how the ESA limits endangered species conservation due to the burden it places on private landowners. The hearing also highlighted the appalling rate at which the ESA delists species, the misleading and deceptive testimony in Court by federal scientists, as well as the costs associated with environmental groups’ ESA litigation. Several species in particular were the topic of discussion, including the outlandish listing guidelines for polar bears and gray wolves. Rep. Dan Benishek and Rep. Sandy Adams also asked pointed questions about the Western Great Lake wolf delisting and the anti-hunting policies used by the Service in implementing the ESA.

SCI has made the modernization of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) one of our top long-term priorities.  For years the ESA has failed to recover species and has been used as a tool to prevent hunting even when hunting has been shown to be beneficial to species conservation.  It is time that the Act is updated in light of recent science and improved best practices in wildlife management. This hearing is an important step in the long-term process of ESA modernization.

Safari Club International would like to thank Rep. Paul Broun for his continued participation in matters pertaining to effective wildlife conservation. He has been a true leader on protecting hunting and promoting sound wildlife management. Please email Congressman Broun and thank him for holding this hearing and highlighting the ESA’s problems.  You can contact him here: https://brounforms.house.gov/Contact/ContactForm.htm.

SCI Foundation Contributes $330,000 To Worldwide Wildlife Conservation Projects In Last Quarter Of Fiscal Year

August 31, 2011. Washington, DC – Safari Club International Foundation (SCIF) announced today that it has contributed over $330,000 in the final quarter of their fiscal year to fund worldwide wildlife conservation projects. SCIF strategically focuses funding towards research and management of large predators and their prey, including game species, principally throughout North America, Asia and Southern Africa.

“The research programs selected by SCIF’s professional biologists inform wildlife managers and policy makers on critical wildlife management needs worldwide,” said SCIF President Joseph Hosmer.  “SCIF strives to ensure management decisions are based on the best available science.”

“Throughout the year, SCIF contributes over one million dollars to wildlife research, management, and anti-poaching programs. As an international organization, SCIF continues to increase our financial impact for sustainable-use conservation and we hope more organizations can follow our lead,” said Hosmer.

North American Projects
SCIF donated $125,000 to fund multiple predator/prey projects in the U.S. and Canada. Conservation projects include caribou in Newfoundland, white-tailed deer in Michigan and Wisconsin, moose in Wyoming and elk in Montana, among others. The results of these projects will help determine the effects predators have on prey, specifically if predation is one of the causes of low juvenile recruitment.

The most recent project is the Montana elk project, in which SCIF has donated $50,000 to help the Montana Fish, Wildlife & Parks with its predator/prey research.  

 

 

 

More National News...

2011 Articles
2010 Articles
Wolf Study

2011 Articles

TWS Spotlights Conflict Of Wildlife Conservation, Animal Rights Philosophy In New Position Statement
10.7.2011. “The Wildlife Society (TWS), representing over 10,000 professional wildlife biologists and managers, has released its final position statement onAnimal Rights Philosophy and Wildlife Conservation.  The Society’s primary position is that the philosophy of animal rights is largely incompatible with science-based conservation and management of wildlife.”

Public Support For Hunting Remains Strong, NSSF Study Shows
10.7.2011. “As sportsmen and sportswomen prepare to celebrate the 40th annual National Hunting & Fishing Day this Saturday, a new study shows that the majority of Americans continue to support hunting. Three-fourths of survey respondents (74 percent) said they approved of hunting, a level of support that has not varied by more than a few percentage points since 1995.” (Source: NSSF Press Release)

SCI Victory Protects Hunting Throughout National Wildlife Refuge System
April 13, 2011 (Washington, DC) – In a ruling issued today, Safari Club International (SCI) claimed a major victory in a lawsuit that has threatened hunting on National Wildlife Refuges since it was filed in 2003. Judge Gwin of the Ohio federal district court today issued a ruling in favor of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and SCI to protect our public lands and keep them open for hunting.

The Fund for Animals sued to challenge hunting on 37 refuges throughout the National Wildlife Refuge system, claiming that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) had not completed a sufficient environmental analysis of the impact of hunting on these refuges. SCI immediately joined as an intervenor in the case on behalf of the FWS in order to help defend the hunting opportunities that exist on the refuges. Read More

2010 Articles

HSUS Attacks Constitutional Right To Hunt And Fish Amendment In Arizona
The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) has recently launched an attack against hunting in the state of Arizona. 

SCI, SCIF Announce Dr. William Moritz As New Executive Director
Safari Club International (SCI) and Safari Club International Foundation (SCIF) are proud to announce that Dr. William E. Moritz is the new Executive Director for the worldwide organizations.

Wildlife And Hunting Heritage Council To Meet, Provide Guidance For Conservation
“The newly announced Wildlife and Hunting Heritage Conservation Council (Council) will hold its first meeting on October 4 and 5, 2010 in Washington, D.C.  The Council is comprised of 18 members who represent some of the most notable national conservation organizations in the country.  The Council will provide advice to the Secretaries of Interior and Agriculture related to recreational hunting and shooting and wildlife conservation on federal and private lands.  http://bit.ly/bqa6aD

EPA Denies Petition Calling For Lead Ammunition Ban
“Washington, DC – The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) denied a petition calling for a ban on the production and distribution of lead hunting ammunition. EPA sent a letter to the petitioners explaining the rejection – that letter can be found here.” (Source: EPA.gov) Read the full press release at this link: http://bit.ly/bbb4Bw

Idaho At Forefront Of Collaboration On Public Land Use
(Idaho Statesman Online) – Private property rights advocate Fred Grant said he lost longtime friends over his willingness to sit down with environmentalists and forge a bill to protect the Owyhee Canyonlands and the ranching culture.  But the 2009 law that established a science-review process, money for ranchers, more than 517,000 acres of wilderness and 315 miles of wild rivers was worth the effort, he said. For more, read HEREorhttp://bit.ly/a5O7Ho

Wolf Study that you should read.....

In studies conducted in Canada on the effects of wolves on ungulates and the ecosystem in general, we find that wolves can be very destructive. This study completed in 2005 gives a look into what the lower 48 states have to look forward to within our ecosystems.

The Study is very worth reading and here’s a quick list of some of what is discovered:

1. Wolves destroy 90% of the elk populations.
2. Elk slaughter by wolves increased in proportion to the severity of the winters.
3. 60% of the elk stopped migrating.
4. Wolves destroyed 56% of moose populations and nearly eliminated calf recruitment.
5. Wolves decimated woodland caribou, bringing that species to ultimate extirpation.
6. Wolves stole 57% of prey kills by grizzlies.
7. Any attempt to manage ungulate numbers anywhere near pre wolf times is a not feasible.
8. Increasing quality habitat for elk had no effect on increasing numbers with wolves present.
9. To begin replenishing ungulate populations, wolf numbers need to be reduced every year by at least 70%. The reduction has to be ongoing, forever.
10. Wolf hunts utilized to control wolf populations are ineffective.

Below is the study conducted through the Unviersity of Montana....

Predator-Prey Management in the National Park Context: Lessons from a Transboundary Wolf, Elk, Moose and Caribou System

Mark Hebblewhite, University of Montana, College of Forestry and Conservation, Wildlife Biology Program Missoula, Montana

Wolves (Canis lupus) are recolonizing much of their former range within the lower 48 states through active recovery (Bangs and Fritts 1996) and natural dispersal (Boyd and Pletscher 1999). Wolf recovery is being touted as one of the great conservation successes of the 20th century (Mech 1995; Smith et al. 2003). In addition to being an important single-species conservation success, wolf recovery may also be one of the most important ecological restoration actions ever taken because of the pervasive ecosystem impacts of wolves (Hebblewhite et al. 2005). Wolf predation is now being restored to ecosystems that have been without the presence of major predators for 70 years or more. Whole generations of wildlife managers and biologists have come up through the ranks, trained in an ungulate- management paradigm developed in the absence of the world’s most successful predator of ungulates - the wolf. Many questions are now facing wildlife managers and scientists about the role of wolf recovery in an ecosystem management context. The effects wolves will have on economically important ungulate populations is emerging as a central issue for wildlife managers. But, questions about the important ecosystem effects of wolves are also emerging as a flurry of new studies reveals the dramatic ecosystem impacts of wolves and their implications for the conservation of biodiversity (Smith et al. 2003; Fortin et al. 2005; Hebblewhite et al. 2005; Ripple and Beschta 2006; Hebblewhite and Smith 2007).

In this paper, I provide for wildlife managers and scientists in areas in the lower 48 states (where wolves are recolonizing) a window to their future by reviewing the effects of wolves on montane ecosystems in Banff National Park (BNP), Alberta. Wolves were exterminated in much of southern Alberta, similar to the lower 48 states, but they recovered through natural dispersal populations to the north in the early 1980s, between 10 and 20 years ahead of wolf recovery in the northwestern states (Gunson 1992; Paquet, et al. 1996). Through this review, I aim to answer the following questions: (1) what have the effects of wolves been on population dynamics of large-ungulate prey, including elk (Cervus elaphus), moose (Alces alces) and threatened woodland caribou (Rangifer tarandus tarandus), (2) what other ecosystem effects have wolves had on montane ecosystems, (3) how sensitive are wolf-prey systems to top-down and bottom-up management to achieve certain human objectives, and (4) how is this likely to be constrained in national park settings? Finally, I discuss the implications of this research in the context of ecosystem management and longterm ranges of variation in ungulate abundance.

Continued: (765 Kb 18 page PDF file): http://tinyurl.com/ygqkovd

NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material  herein is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit
research and  educational purposes only. For more information go to:  http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml


More Local News...

2011 Articles

Montana Court Denies Motion to Intervene in Constitutional Challenge to Wolf Law – SCI Considers Course of Action
June 2, 2011. On Wednesday, June 1st, Judge Donald Molloy of the Montana federal district court, denied Safari Club International and the National Rifle Association of America’s motion to intervene to defend the constitutionality of the recently passed wolf delisting rider.  This rider to the 2011 budget bill directed the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to delist Montana and Idaho’s wolves.  Judge Molloy denied all the motions to intervene in the case that had been filed by sportsmen’s groups, other nonprofits and the State of Idaho.  This decision has essentially silenced the voice of hunters from being heard in this court.  SCI’s attorneys are now examining a variety of options that would enable them to persist in their defense of the delisting law to ensure that the interests of hunters are represented.  Please read below to see further SCI’s efforts to remove recovered wolves from the endangered species list.

February 28, 2011. The battle to delist wolves continues. See story with quotes from Representative Lummis (R) Wyoming; Miles Moretti, Mule Deer Foundation; David Allen, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation and Don Peay, Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife.

2010 Articles

Wolf Delisting Needs Your Help
September 25, 2010. From M. David Allen, President/CEO, Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation.

  • Senators Orin Hatch and Harry Reid have agreed to introduce a bill to call for delisting of wolves EVERYWHERE in this current Congressional session. It is as simple as that, we are calling for the total delisting of wolves period. The science is clear on this issue. GRAY WOLVES ARE NOT ENDANGERED OR EVEN THREATENED.
  • This bill would be the same bill as what Chet Edwards introduced in the House.
  • We have an issue with a couple of key senators right now that needs our grass roots attention. Senators Crapo and Risch from Idaho are introducing a bill that carves out just Montana & Idaho to delist wolves and return them back to their status before Judge Molloy's last ruling. This will not fix the real problem and will most likely end back up in Molloy's federal court PLUS we do not favor leaving out Wyoming, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan or any other state for that matter. This issue needs to be fixed not delayed and stalled and linger in court.
  • Senator Baucus has indicated that he will introduced a bill very similar to Crapo & Risch; basically carving out just Montana and Idaho for delisting and not all states and we anticipate that the junior Senator from MT, Senator Tester will follow his lead.

Here is our call to action if you are willing to support: We need sportsmen and hunters to call the offices of Senator Crapo, Senator Ricsh, Senator Baucus and Senator Tester ask them to consider supporting the Chet Edwards bill and support what Senators Hatch and Reid and willing to sponsor. We encourage groups to ask their members to call these two Senators asking them to support the complete delisting of wolves. This is a chance for real bipartisan action and to represent the issue of states' rights and states' local economies.

Their Washington DC & Idaho phone numbers are:

  • Crapo office (202) 224-6142 and 208-334-1776
  • Risch office (202) 224-2752 and 208-342-7985
  • Baucus office 202-224-2651 and 406-657-6790
  • Tester office 202-224-2644 and 406-728-3003

The chance of passing this legislation in this session is most likely a long shot; however now is the time to get these politicians to go on the record to call for total delisting of wolves, period. We will not get this kind of leverage after the November election.

Chaffetz to Push Legislation Removing Gray Wolf from Consideration under Endangered Species Act
September 22, 2010. Washington, DC—Today, Congressman Jason Chaffetz announced he will seek to remove the gray wolf from the Endangered Species Act.  Rep. Chaffetz joins Democrat Congressman Chet Edwards in supporting HR 6028, which would ask Congress to amend the 1973 act “to prohibit treatment of the Gray Wolf as an endangered species or threatened species.” The move comes in response to a recent court ruling effectively reinstating endangered status for the wolf in the entire western United States.

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) first issued the decision to delist the wolf in 2008, after the species had met recovery goals of 30 breeding pairs and 300 wolves for eight consecutive years. Wildlife biologists estimate there are 1,700 wolves in several western states. Wolves were first placed on the endangered species list in 1974.

“Wolf populations have grown significantly since first receiving protection under the Endangered Species Act,” said Chaffetz.  “They have grown well beyond their target populations. The wolf is devastating wildlife populations and cattle. This is a vital issue to farmers, ranchers, sportsmen and outdoor recreationists.   It is appropriate to have the wolf delisted at this time.”

Bipartisan recommendations by both the Obama and Bush Administrations have recommended the de-listing of wolves and turning their management over to the state wildlife agencies.

“We need to ensure that wildlife management plans are retained at the state level rather than the federal level,” said Chaffetz.

Copyright ©2011 Safari Club International - Western Montana Chapter. All Rights Reserved.